Wednesday, March 28, 2007
Making sense of Our World
Boy this makes alot of sense......We have half our navy sitting off the coast of Iran, flying mock missions, and just kinda whistling and looking the other way like no one will notice. I wonder how much of the DEFENSE budget money it takes to keep all those ships and all those personel in place just to show force that everyone knows we cant use. The ugly secret is that it is a secret. Yes, the disasterpresident is burning up our future to threaten another nation that has not done anything to us, AGAIN. (They did hold our embassy personel hostage almost 30 years ago...If we want to go back in history, Britain burned
Washington to the ground in 1814) Why are we doing this? Is it because they are trying to buy uranium from Chad? No, mister disasterpresident, we already used that LIE. Is it because they are a grave danger to the United States? No mister disasterpresident, I dont think the World will buy that again. Poland and Bulgaria wont send their 250 soldiers again to fight in that War that you want to start. So why does the United States want to stop any kind of Nuclear program in Iran? It is Israeli foreign policy. You all must know by now that if JudeoFascists want it, they can get their American lapdog to do it. The disasterpresident looks good in a collar but not in a flight suit. I certainly dont see him prancing around any of the AirCraft Carriers he has poised to strike Iran. Get ready for another Gulf of Tonkin incident. 'Oops mr. disasterpresident, two gun boats from Iran came out and fired on our 75 ship flotilla, Oh God, what should we do?' This would be the kind of moronic excuse put out by this disasterpresident to justify whatever foreign policy whim he has at the time.
Lets face facts. Iran wants a stable friendly Iraq. They used to have a stable unfriendly Iraq with Saddam. Now they have an unstable semifriendly Iraq with the majority Shiite. Iran could make things a whole lot worse for our troops, but they are not right now. If the disastercowboy decides to push Iran much more, you will see American Military casualties like you never did in Viet Nam. Is this supporting the Troops? If he chooses to veto the latest appropriation because the DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS decides to use its constitutional authority and bring this disasterpresident back down to Earth and the rule of law, will that be supporting the Troops? When you dont plan to care for the CASUALTIES that will come home from the ILLEGAL PREEMPTIVE WAR that you are going to start when you get into office, is that supporting the troops? If you cut the salaries and benefits of troops before you go to War, is this supporting the troops? When you dont allow pictures of flag drapped coffins coming home from your ILLEGAL WAR, is that supporting the troops.
I think I will be thinking about this whole mess for a long time to make sense of what it is that was being accomplished. Especially since we will be paying for this WAR CRIMINALS' deeds for quite a long time.
Anyone for IMPEACHMENT?
Phillip Wister
Washington to the ground in 1814) Why are we doing this? Is it because they are trying to buy uranium from Chad? No, mister disasterpresident, we already used that LIE. Is it because they are a grave danger to the United States? No mister disasterpresident, I dont think the World will buy that again. Poland and Bulgaria wont send their 250 soldiers again to fight in that War that you want to start. So why does the United States want to stop any kind of Nuclear program in Iran? It is Israeli foreign policy. You all must know by now that if JudeoFascists want it, they can get their American lapdog to do it. The disasterpresident looks good in a collar but not in a flight suit. I certainly dont see him prancing around any of the AirCraft Carriers he has poised to strike Iran. Get ready for another Gulf of Tonkin incident. 'Oops mr. disasterpresident, two gun boats from Iran came out and fired on our 75 ship flotilla, Oh God, what should we do?' This would be the kind of moronic excuse put out by this disasterpresident to justify whatever foreign policy whim he has at the time.
Lets face facts. Iran wants a stable friendly Iraq. They used to have a stable unfriendly Iraq with Saddam. Now they have an unstable semifriendly Iraq with the majority Shiite. Iran could make things a whole lot worse for our troops, but they are not right now. If the disastercowboy decides to push Iran much more, you will see American Military casualties like you never did in Viet Nam. Is this supporting the Troops? If he chooses to veto the latest appropriation because the DEMOCRATIC CONGRESS decides to use its constitutional authority and bring this disasterpresident back down to Earth and the rule of law, will that be supporting the Troops? When you dont plan to care for the CASUALTIES that will come home from the ILLEGAL PREEMPTIVE WAR that you are going to start when you get into office, is that supporting the troops? If you cut the salaries and benefits of troops before you go to War, is this supporting the troops? When you dont allow pictures of flag drapped coffins coming home from your ILLEGAL WAR, is that supporting the troops.
I think I will be thinking about this whole mess for a long time to make sense of what it is that was being accomplished. Especially since we will be paying for this WAR CRIMINALS' deeds for quite a long time.
Anyone for IMPEACHMENT?
Phillip Wister
Comments:
<< Home
It's a well known fact by historians that the golf of Tonkin incident was done by the USA government. More recently, the government declassified documents to prove the incident was our own government firing at itself
Post a Comment
# posted by 
: 1:34 PM
: 1:34 PM << Home
